Re: Builds slow as they go

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Builds slow as they go

Alexander Neundorf-3
On Wednesday 16 December 2009, Phil Smith wrote:
> As Hawkeye said in the Second City version of Last of the Mohicans, "Me
> lie, big deal". Turns out I'd munged the path and have been using 2.6 all
> this time. Upgrading to 2.8 *did* make a *huge* difference, like 60% or so.
> Cow-orker had lied when he said he'd upgraded :-(
>
> Thanks!

Cool, so it works ok now for you ?

Alex


> ...phsiii
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Neundorf [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 3:28 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Cc: Phil Smith
> Subject: Re: [CMake] Builds slow as they go
>
> On Thursday 19 November 2009, Phil Smith wrote:
> > Our build is on the order of 400 modules. It starts off very briskly and
>
> You mean like 400 targets, where the later ones depend on the earlier ones
> ? Maybe there's a lot of dependency scanning going on.
> Did you try cmake 2.8.0 ? This got faster there.
> Another option would of course be to try to reduce the dependencies.
>
> Alex
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake